The carbon belt drive system is gaining ground over the traditional steel chain, especially on bicycles intended for urban use, leisure riding, and, to a lesser extent, gravel riding. We have analyzed the main advantages of each solution to help determine which is the best choice in each situation. We explain it in the following table:
| Feature | Chain Drive | Carbon Belt Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Material | Steel chain (links and pins) | Carbon fiber strands inside a polyurethane belt |
| Weight | Heavier | Lighter |
| Maintenance | Needs regular oiling, cleaning, can rust | Almost maintenance-free, just occasional wash |
| Durability | Good, but stretches over time and wears | Very durable, can last 2–3x longer than a chain |
| Efficiency | Very efficient when clean and lubricated | Slightly less efficient initially but consistent over time |
| Noise | Can be noisy if dry or dirty | Super quiet |
| Compatibility | Works with derailleur gears (multi-speed) | Only works with internally geared hubs or single-speed |
| Cost | Cheap to replace | Expensive (belt + specific frame design) |
| Frame Requirements | Standard frames | Frame must split or open to fit the belt (belt can't break open like a chain) |
| Common Use | Mountain bikes, road bikes, all general use |
Commuter bikes, touring, city bikes, sometimes gravel |
Quick thoughts:
-
If you want low maintenance, quiet rides, and don't need lots of gears → Carbon belt is awesome.
-
If you want flexibility, cheap repairs, high efficiency and multi-gearing (like a 12-speed setup) → Chain is still king.
Belt drives are becoming super popular on commuter bikes, especially with internal gear hubs (like Shimano Alfine or Rohloff). But for hardcore MTB or racing, chains dominate because of the flexibility and repairability.
Are you thinking about switching? What kind of riding do you usually do? 🚲
